Early settlers lose.
Birmingham blog over at circa1815.tumblr.com
Catching Elephant is a theme by Andy Taylor
Barclays senior trader in New York to the bank’s libor submitter, 13 Sept. 2006
(Source: The New York Times)
Just a snapshot of how the NY Times explains the Libor scandal via this infographic.
Jeffrey Sachs, 45th Annual Meeting of the ADB Board of Governors (3 May 2012, Manila)
Sachs: I see a recovery! Yonder!
Jolie: (unimpressed)
Richard Williamson writes:
Back in November, Karl Smith made the clearest statement I have ever read of the New Keynesian explanation of a recession:
I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession is not when something bad happens. A recession is not when people are poor.
A recession is when markets fail to clear. We have workers without factories and factories without workers. We have cars without drivers and drivers without cars. We have homes without families and families without their own home.
Prices clear markets. If there is a recession, something is wrong with prices.
Right now, unemployment remains at over 8% in the UK while real wages are lower than they were 7 years ago and are continuing to fall. Yes, you read that correctly. Which immediately leads one to ask: on this explanation of a recession as expounded by Karl, how much further do real wages have to fall to eliminate disequilibrium unemployment?
(Source: shewingthefly.com)
“If spending money like water was the answer to our country’s problems, we would have no problems now. If ever a nation has spent, spent, spent and spent again, ours has. Today that dream is over.”
- the real Margaret Thatcher, speaking at the Conservative Party Conference. 10 October 1980.
It’s true that people are continuing to produce extraordinary amounts of great pop music, probably more than ever before, even though it’s increasingly difficult to get paid for it. You could characterise this as part of a growing cultural intuition that the most valuable things in life are not part of the cash economy…We’re living in a social moment where, more than usually, money has come unglued from value.
An anti-WEF demonstrator uses water from a puddle to wash his eyes after he was sprayed with tear gas by Swiss Riot Police during a protest against the ongoing World Economic Forum in Davos January 28, 2012.
[Credit : Miro Kuzmanovic/Reuters]
Buzzword
The historical precedents – and much of the commentary coming out of Germany – suggest that Germany will not take steps to reverse the trade surplus. Countries that run large and persistent trade surpluses never seem to understand that their surpluses are mainly the consequences of domestic policies that generate additional domestic growth by absorbing foreign demand.
On the contrary, they usually insist that the surpluses are the consequences of domestic virtue, and they see no reason to give up being virtuous. Surpluses, they seem to believe, are the way God rewards them for their enviable behavior, and as their surpluses decline – an inevitable consequence of the malaise affecting their trading counterparts – they actually try to limit the decline and do all they can do to prevent it from becoming a growing trade deficit.
But this violates simple arithmetic. Trade deficit nations have received capital inflows for many years from surplus nations as the automatic counterpart to their deficits. If the surplus nations ever hope to get repaid – i.e. to reverse those capital flows – then it must be obvious that the trade imbalances must also reverse. (Read on)